.380 Kimber and Sig - Kimber Forum


Go Back   Kimber Forum > Kimber Model Specific > Kimber Micro Carry Forum

Like Tree24Likes
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-14-2017, 03:45 AM   #1
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 8
.380 Kimber and Sig

Picked up a new Sig P238 HD about 2 weeks ago. Very nice gun. My wife wanted to shoot the gun so she went with me to the range. She loves the gun and pretty much took possession of it. This was our fist experience with a pocket .380 and I was so impressed, I knew I wanted another one for myself. I always liked the way the Kimber Micro's looked, so as soon as I got home from the range, I ordered a Micro Raptor in black. I though it would be cool to have a different brand to compare against the Sig P238.

The Raptor recently showed up. Very beautiful handgun, just looks great. Out of the box, the trigger pull was heavy, but not bad. The trigger is a bit better on the Sig. It is a few pounds lighter, as I have changed the hammer spring to a low power one. Also it is a bit more broke in. The Kimber Micro trigger is about the same as the Sig when it was bone stock brand new, but maybe a pound heavier. It would only sometimes register on my trigger pull tool, which reads to a max of 8.5 lbs. I pulled the Kimber apart to see about putting the original hammer spring from the P238, only to find there is no hammer spring! Seems Kimber has a slightly different design than the Colt Mustang. The reset is better/shorter on the Kimber Micro.

I stripped, cleaned, and oiled the Kimber and headed to the range with both pocket 380's. I put about 185 maiden rounds through the Kimber. The Kimber actually failed to eject the first round lol. However, the next 184 were no issue. A few times, the slide didn't hold open after the last round, but this also happened with the Sig during its first 150 rounds. Both guns shoot great. The recoil is noticeably different between the two. The heavier Sig (weighs 6.5 oz more than the Kimber) has less recoil. This did not bother me one bit, but to my wife it did. She did not like the Kimber. The recoil and front stippling bothered her hand just after a few rounds. I love the stippling and it doesn't bother me, it really helps with keeping a tight grip. The tritium sights on both are great.

The Kimber trigger has improved a bit after the first range visit and second cleaning. Later that night I stripped down the Kimber, removed the grips, and cleaned/oiled it up good. After reassembling, I checked the trigger pull again and it has dropped about a pound to around 7-7.5 lbs.

All in all, I do like the Kimber Micro. I put the 185 rounds through it pretty fast. The accuracy is as good as the P238. I was getting decent 3-4" groups at 7 yards with both guns. I like the way the Kimber looks too. It is a fine looking handgun. Just looks old school 1911. The Sig HD with the extra weight feels better in the hand though. Also, the slide is smoother than the Kimber and a bit easier to pull back. The Kimber looks like a nicer gun with all the serrations and detailed stippling, but the Sig P238HD, with the nicer trigger, smoother and easier slide, and slightly heavier weight, just feels a bit better built. The 20 oz. weight of the P238HD may be an issue for pocket carry for some people, so there is kind of a trade off. The Kimber already has an aluminum trigger, but this did not make it any better than the plastic one on the P238. Also, I can get an aftermarket aluminum trigger for the P238 and get the trigger feel even better. Not sure what the options are for improving the one on the Kimber Micro.

I will continue to shoot these sweet little pocket .380's and update this post as I go. So far I am enjoying my first foray into these pocket guns! I am even considering getting a Glock 42, just because lol.
I would post some pics, but the photobucket sight won't let me login right now.
Chuck43, Oreste, RustyIron and 7 others like this.

Last edited by ROMM; 03-14-2017 at 03:47 AM.
ROMM is offline   Reply With Quote
Remove Ads
Old 03-14-2017, 03:54 AM   #2
Senior Member
JC45's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Northeast Pa
Posts: 6,881
Welcome to the forum from Northeast, Pa.
Congratulations on both guns.
JC45 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2017, 04:26 AM   #3
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 10
Congratulations on both guns. When you find a good one (or two) count your blessings.I too have a Micro .380 with over 600 trouble free rounds. Nice little shooter.
pcovers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2017, 06:36 AM   #4
Super Moderator
Chuck43's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Northern Illinois
Posts: 34,757
Welcome to the forum from northern Illinois ROMM, nice report on the Micro Carry and P238. You wife not liking your Kimber Raptor could be a blessing in disguise.
"The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not."-- Thomas Jefferson
Chuck43 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2017, 07:14 AM   #5
Senior Member
Cybercycle's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Middle TN
Posts: 1,706
Interesting report...my wife didn't like the Kimber either (prefers and bought the G42).
US Air Force 1969 - 1972
Tennessee HCP
NRA Member
OGCA - Life Member
Cybercycle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2017, 09:24 AM   #6
Senior Member
sawman556's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 191
I think the Kimber Micro is a nicer pistol than the 238. Now if Kimber could get their shit together and offer parts and reasonable repair times they would get a lot less negative reviews on the forums. Kimber should also get rid of their shitty KimPro finish for something better. I'm actually going to Black-T or NP3 my Micro Raptor when I get time.

The Kimber uses a traditional 1911 style mainspring assembly (see photo). Sig and Colt hammer springs are not going to work. My trigger has smoothed up and lightened a fair amount just by shooting and dry firing it. If you go with an aftermarket aluminum trigger for your 238, be aware that the trigger pin can be a bear to remove. You might want to get an extra pin when you make the change.

Photobucket blows! You can upload pics my clicking "manage attachments" when replying to a post.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg kimbera01a.jpg (576.1 KB, 28 views)
File Type: jpg 20170301_232717[3101].jpg (1.70 MB, 19 views)
ROMM likes this.
sawman556 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2017, 10:01 AM   #7
Senior Member
2sharp2's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Chattanooga
Posts: 12,252
ROMM, welcome to the site from Tennessee. A lot of members here have both Micro and Sig 380's. I don't own a 380 but I can see good and bad things about both. Like many others I would probably own at least one of each.
I agree with Chuck, your wife not liking the Micro is probably a good thing.
Chuck43 and Tinman like this.
The Kimber Family

CDP & RCP Ultra's
Classic Carry Pro (Factory Bone Grips)
Custom Two-Tone 45/.460Rowland
Gold Combat Limited Edition
Master Carry Pro
Sapphire Ultra 9mm
SIS Custom, Pro, Ultra
Stainless Ultra Carry 9mm
Stainless Raptor Custom, Pro, Ultra
Super Carry Ultra Plus

84M Longmaster Classic SS .308
SVT 22lr Stainless Fluted Bull Barrel
Kimber Of America 82 Stainless Fluted .22lr
84M Varmint Stainless 204 Ruger
2sharp2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2017, 10:31 AM   #8
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 533
Welcome from Oklahoma. My wife loves her Micro .380, but also likes my Solo.
Trex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2017, 10:37 AM   #9
Senior Member
swca's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Spring Valley,Ca.
Posts: 4,175
ROMM That is a nice review and comparison of the formentioned firearms. It is almost impossible to find a Kimber micro in So.Cal. I have contemplated buying the sig HD myself the only thing is I think I would prefer the 938. I do own a blued series 80 Colt Mustang. Beautiful little pistol!

Where freedom dwells is my country!

CDP Pro II .45 acp
Raptor II (blue) .45 acp
Eclipse II 10 mm
Ultra Carry II .45 acp
Stainless Pro Carry II
Solo STS 9 mm
swca is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2017, 10:55 AM   #10
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: East of Eden
Posts: 2,020
Originally Posted by swca View Post
ROMM That is a nice review and comparison of the formentioned firearms. It is almost impossible to find a Kimber micro in So.Cal. I have contemplated buying the sig HD myself the only thing is I think I would prefer the 938. I do own a blued series 80 Colt Mustang. Beautiful little pistol!
I like the 238 HD and a 938 HD would 'get my attention'...on the 'lgs' spot!
2sharp2 and swca like this.
...all that really counts is $$$

'Gun Knowledge' without gun experience is 'Untrained Speculation'.
Marshall....I don't post personal gun pictures on KT or any site, for any reason. Never have/never will. Taking IP risk is for those that choose to do so, I don't. If you have a problem with that, choose a orifice. End of subject.
Tinman is offline   Reply With Quote

Search tags for this page

kimber micro 380 review


kimber micro 380 review 2017

kimber micro 380 trigger job

kimber micro 380 trigger pull

kimber micro 380 vs sig p238
kimber vs spring .380
micro rapter vs p238
Click on a term to search for related topics.

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Kimber verses Sig tevans9129 Kimber Talk 35 04-19-2017 04:12 AM
My recent experience with Kimber Manufacturing Supercarrycustom83 Kimber Talk 5 01-27-2017 03:49 AM
Which Kimber Solo is best ? Or should I forget the Solo ? RockyRiver Kimber Talk 48 01-26-2017 06:49 AM
Micro 9. Second trip to Kimber problems issues Choward6 Kimber Micro 9 Forum 5 01-24-2017 08:00 PM
Kimber Micro .380 Magazine Spring Experiment TheOxygenMan Kimber Micro Carry Forum 21 01-08-2017 10:40 AM