rethinking my firepower.... - Kimber Forum

Kimber


Go Back   Kimber Forum > Kimber Model Specific > Kimber Solo Forum

Like Tree2Likes
  • 1 Post By Rangemeister
  • 1 Post By Soloist
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-05-2017, 07:08 PM   #1
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Spartanburg, South Carolina USA
Posts: 82
rethinking my firepower....

some time ago I bitched about the Federal HST Micro 9mm, saying the ballistics were shit and it was a bad idea... but it did/does function the Solo every time. The recoil is drastically reduced, even if the bullet is about 1/2 as effective as the 124 or 147fr versions.

So.... I'm thinking of loading the Micro in the barrel and 124gr regular in the mag. That way the 1st shot if nothing will disable or slow the fight so the follow up double tap will be faster on target...

thoughts?
Soloist is offline   Reply With Quote
Remove Ads
Old 07-06-2017, 02:37 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
The Tourist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 7,238
I haven't fired that many HSTs in my .45 Kimber. I did have a few hang-ups as the edges of the hollowpoints snagged on the feedramp.

The Critical Defense and the Guard Dogs worked every time, so I stayed with them. Perhaps I should investigate more, myself.
__________________
...No matter where you are it's enemy territory...
The Tourist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2017, 08:04 AM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Middle Tennessee
Posts: 587
Tough question and I think no definitive answer because of the people factor. I have decided to carry the 85 DRT in the summer and the Micro HST in the winter with the thinking being, 6 or 7 low recoil on target shots would be more effective than 2 or 3 follow-up shots with 124 that has questionable target hitting ability. Results mostly due to my ability to control recoil of the Solo. I have shot a couple of different Solos over the years and initially the 124 or 147 was quite manageable. As I age and hand strength, arthur, etc, become factors, I have found I can get better results (target hitting wise) with the reduced recoil and for me there is quite a difference.
Soloist likes this.
Rangemeister is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Old 07-06-2017, 12:20 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: northeast pa.
Posts: 508
I use hydro shok 135 grn. low recoil, shoots very well.
427malibu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2017, 03:17 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
PaulWVa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Dunbar, WVa
Posts: 1,498
Everyone likes something different...

I haven't tried this ammo yet but I might look into it. When I carry my Sig P320, 9mm, sub-compact I load it with Liberty Civil Defense ammo.
It's a little controversial, for some, it's loaded with 50 grn FHP (frangible hollow point) , at 2000 fps from a 4" barrel. Very low recoil, low carry weight and blows through Level 3 body amour like cardboard. Runs great so far, no jams, FF or FE. I would try it in any small 9mm. I carry it in my .38 spec. too.

Last edited by PaulWVa; 04-21-2018 at 08:45 AM.
PaulWVa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2017, 10:26 PM   #6
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Spartanburg, South Carolina USA
Posts: 82
my fear of "micro" or "low recoil" ammo is we're talking about a VERY small, highly tuned action that isn't as forgiving as a 5" like say a 92 or XD. The failure of pre-qualifying buyers on this stuff is why the Solo is now out of production. Wrong ammo + bad handling = failure.
I agree guys, we all want the most forward damage with the least amount of rear damage. The trade off is dependability. I need to do more testing with the 'micro' stuff, but for t-shirt weather I do believe it will be just fine.
Rangemeister likes this.
Soloist is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On