Who's Next... - Kimber Forum

Kimber


Go Back   Kimber Forum > Off Topic Area > Off-Topic Discussion Forum

Like Tree9Likes
  • 2 Post By cousinmark
  • 3 Post By DeOlMan
  • 1 Post By Shootinit
  • 1 Post By cousinmark
  • 1 Post By Albert.Cairns
  • 1 Post By Shootinit
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-07-2018, 10:34 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 2,386
Who's Next...

...nope, I'm not talking about the legendary Who album.

...I'm wondering who or what will be the next to be "removed" as a social presence media wise? I noticed a few weeks ago James Yeager the "1911s suck" tool was gone? Now Alex Jones? I'm sure there've been more. As far as I can tell this began after the last FL school shooting, Parkland I believe?
...how far do you think this trend will continue???
Chuck43 and Karens like this.
cousinmark is offline   Reply With Quote
Remove Ads
Old 08-07-2018, 10:46 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
DeOlMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Near the Home of John Moses Browning
Posts: 214
It has already extended way too far!
Chuck43, cousinmark and Bish like this.
DeOlMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2018, 10:50 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Shootinit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 4,003
YOU TUBE USERS have a good class action suit on their hands..many invested in lots of video gear under the guise of getting paid for their work...then you tube up and changed the game without notice.
cousinmark likes this.

Last edited by Shootinit; 08-07-2018 at 11:47 PM.
Shootinit is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Old 08-07-2018, 10:57 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 2,386
Originally Posted by Shootinit View Post
YOU TUBE USERS have a good class action suit on their hands..many invested in lots of video gear under the guise of getting paid for their work...then you tube up and changed the gave without notice.
Sure looks that way? I know MANY European countries ban "hate speech". Here we have the 1st amendment though right???
Chuck43 likes this.
cousinmark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2018, 11:54 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Albert.Cairns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 1,873
Don't forget, youtube is a private business and not bound to the constitution in any way. Constitution controls government actions. Now can you argue that its the same as an electric company or gas company that's regulated because people can't do without it. Is the internet now the same as companies that people must have for every day life? Is information now as necessary as heat and power and must not discriminate?
Only time will tell.
Mini Me likes this.
Albert.Cairns is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2018, 12:05 AM   #6
Senior Member
 
Shootinit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 4,003
http://thehill.com/policy/technology...rvative-videos
Shootinit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2018, 12:09 AM   #7
Senior Member
 
Shootinit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 4,003
as usual the lawyers will make out either way
cousinmark likes this.
Shootinit is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On