Kimber Talk Forums banner
1 - 18 of 18 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
3 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Got one of these for a Christmas present this year and am looking for an accurate bullet/powder combo for this rifle. I've tried three loads that shoot well in my Ruger American Predator 6.5 Creedmoor and all have yielded less than stellar results in the Hunter.

All with Federal 210 primers and Hornady cases:

Hornady 140 grain AMAX with H4350
Hornady 129 grain SST with W760
Nosler 120 grain Ballistic Tip with IMR4895

Five shot groups for each of the above bullet/powder combos are about 1.5 inches. The 140 grain AMAX load is the match load supplied by Hornady. The other two loads are from the most recent Nosler and Hornaday reloading manuals.

I've used both Hornady 120 and 123 grain AMAX's in the Ruger, but both bullets have destroyed far too much meat in the deer that I've shot with them.

Thanks
 

· Administrator
Joined
·
42,293 Posts
My 84M did not come with any. I'd like to know what factory ammo these things like before I spend a fortune buying every box I come across!
Give Kimber's customer service a call, they can answer your questions.

Customer Service
Toll-Free: (888) 243-4522
Hours: M-F, 9:30 a.m.- 6 p.m. Eastern
 

· Registered
Joined
·
13 Posts
My Montana 6.5 Creedmoor likes 130 gr bullets much more than 140 gr. 130 gr Nosler Accubond with AA4350 has worked well and produced 0.25-0.50" groups at 100.

Good luck, work up carefully, and let us know what you find.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

· Registered
Joined
·
12 Posts
6.5 Creedmoor Hunter

First trip to the range with my new 6.5 hunter. Broke barrel in with a box of Federal 129 inter-bond. Shot 2 clean- etc.
Tried 3 shot group Federal Precision hunter 143 eld-x. Had two almost touching but third was 3 min so not to good.
Tried Federal Hog Hunter 120 solid copper. Group was 1.2 min with 2 and 3 almost touching. Shot 1 fouler after cleaning each group. Will try 2 fouler next session.
I think the rifle is trying to tell me something with both groups having two of three almost touching. Hoping to get acceptable groups out of factory ammo.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
3 Posts
Discussion Starter · #7 ·
Test targets

No, my rifle did not have a test target in the box.

Just came back from a whitetail management hunt last night and killed a doe and a cull buck last weekend with 129 grain Hornady SST's and 45 grains of W760.

Neither shot was over 100 yards. I was really surprised at the amount of tissue damage with this bullet, even at 2800 fps. Not as much as with the 120/123 AMAX's but far too much meat damage for me to consider it as candidate for long term load development.

One was a head shot, so no problem with that one. The other was shot at 86 yards behind the shoulder in the ribs. The entrance wound was the size of a golf ball and the exit about the diameter of a pencil.

I'll try Berger and Sierra bullets next.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1 Posts
Problems with 84M Hunter

Hello,
I just got a brand new Kimber 84M Hunter model chambered in 6.5 Creedmoor for Christmas. I finally got a chance to test fire it last week. This is my first Kimber rifle. It will probably be my last Kimber product ever. In fact, after trying this stuff I will most likely ditch this rifle and buy something else. I make that statement based on previous issues I had with Kimber about one of their pistols, but that is a different story. It wasn't my choice to buy this model in the first place and would not have been my first choice if it was up to me, but it was a present from my family who bought it without knowing any better. (So I may have to keep it so I don't hurt anybody's feelings).
While searching for a solution to some problems I encountered, I found this forum. I thought I would share my results and opinions about this rifle. My issues are not yet resolved as I haven't contacted Kimber about them yet but figured I might save someone some hassle by reporting my findings so nobody buys one of these without knowing.

After firing one box of ammo, I have found the following issues:
1. 3 shells barely fit in the clip.
2. If 3 shells are in the clip, it is really hard to insert it into the rifle with the bolt closed.
3. If 3 shells are in the clip, it is really hard to chamber the first round.
4. Inserting the shells in the clip "incorrectly" can result in an odd condition preventing 3 rounds from even being inserted.
5. The bolt has a separate problem causing it to stick while cycling it to chamber a round.
6. The ejected shells are flipping around and striking the action causing dented case mouths and marks on the metal.
7. The safety lever doesn't seem to work very well.
8. Accuracy seems to be so-so and not what I was expecting.

Those are the most serious of my complaints. In addition to those:
1. The stock color is horrible! Sort of a puke-green color.
2. The one-piece stock/trigger guard also looks tacky.
3. The butt pad seems cheap and feels like it is barely held-on.
4. The barrel is slightly off-center in the stock. It is visually too far to the left.
5. I don't personally like the "hook" shape of the trigger.

The good stuff?
1. It is very light weight.
2. It seems to handle nicely and point natural. The stock contours fit me well.
3. The trigger pull seems smooth with a crisp release.
4. The machine work is very nicely done.

Still reading? Here's the details:
There is something inherently wrong with the design.
1. Per the specs on the rifle, the clip is supposed to hold 3 rounds. And in fact it does….barely. 3 shells will just barely slip into it. There is almost no free-play and that third round is a bit of a chore to insert.
2. The tightness of the rounds in the clip is causing 2 issues. First, because there is no room to compress the shells further it is (very) hard to insert the clip into the rifle while the bolt is closed. Basically you are trying to compress the spring farther than it is free to go. It takes a goodly amount of squeeze to get it to insert and latch. Secondly, because of this tight compression on the shells in the clip, the first round to chamber is squeezed so tight it can't effectively slide out smoothly. When you start to close the bolt, the top shell moves forward about a quarter inch until the bullet contacts the feed ramp. At this point, practically the entire length of the shell body is still gripped by the lips of the clip. As the bullet starts to ride-up the feed ramp, the shell has nowhere to go except up, but because there is no room in the clip to pivot and allow the head to drop down a bit as the bullet end rises, the shell is forced vertically between the lips, essentially it is 'ripped' upwards, forcing the lips to open unnaturally as the shell squeezes between them (rather than sliding out the end) and the shell pops-out and is captured by the bolt. Note that this is NOT a smooth movement. It normally stops part-way requiring a very firm push to get it to release, or even a couple back-and-forth "bumps" with the bolt to get that first round out. This may also be causing some of the accuracy issues as noted below. Note also that the second and third shells from the clip feed very nice and smooth.
3. The design of the shell follower in the clip is such that if you press the shells the wrong way as you insert them, they can become staggered incorrectly. When this happens a third round can't be inserted at all. This is because of the shape of the shell follower. It has an odd "pointy" ridge that is supposed to guide the first shell in place to the correct side of the clip. Because of the way it is shaped the first shell can actually get lodged on-top of that pointy ridge while the second shell is inserted and essentially reversing the direction of the stagger. That prevents the third round from going in, until you remove the shells and re-insert them to allow it to go the other way. That's harder to explain that it actually is, but it happens.
4. I mentioned the bolt is sticking for a different reason too. For some reason they machined a shallow groove in the bolt immediately behind the locking lugs. The groove is .005" deep. It just happens to exactly align with the rear of the action and because of normal "play" in the bolt fit, it can get stuck on that groove. Any upwards pressure on the bolt while sliding it forward will cause the thing to catch. It will usually just be a slight 'stutter and release', but sometimes it catches and stops the bolt movement dead in its tracks. I can guess why the groove is there. I think it is a beauty ring to separate the highly polished body of the bolt from the unpolished matte section. Basically a break-point for looks only. But I am just guessing at that.
5. When the fired cases are ejected, they flip in a circle and the mouths of the cases are striking the action body just in front of where the bolt lifts. This is denting the shell mouths and making little arc-shaped brass marks on the receiver metal. The marks wipe-off easily, but if they were to strike slightly higher or lower, they would either be digging into the plastic stock, or striking the scope mounts. If someone was saving the shells for hand loads, the mouths are now dented.
6. The safety lever doesn't seem to work very well. It releases to the fire position really nice and easy, but trying to cram it back to safe is not so good. And in fact, I haven't been able to simply 'flick' the safety to the center position at all and it requires me to use both thumb and finger to grab it and sort-of cram it in place. Going from 'fire' to full 'safe' can be done by yanking it back all the way with just one finger, but that seems sort-of unnatural to me. You certainly can't put it back on safe with just your thumb.
7. Now accuracy. Very poor in my initial tests. But as mentioned above, I have to wonder if the problem chambering the first (of 3) shells might be causing issues. It must be bending the shells in the somewhat 'violent' twisting while trying to get the first round in. I have to wonder if the bullet might be getting slightly bent out of axial alignment? That is a known issue with accuracy in general. But I would need to do more tests to prove or eliminate that as an issue.
In my testing I was shooting 3-shot groups. 2 shots were usually very close and the third was way out from the rest. At 100 yards, I had 1 target with 2 shots at .5" and the third was 1" away. The second 100 yard target had 2 shots at .25" and the third shot was 1.9" away.
At 200 yards the first target had 3 shots in 1.8" (less than 1 MOA as spec'd) and the next target at 200 yards was a 3" group!! Granted, different ammo, my ability to shoot, and wind conditions also come into play so the accuracy may improve with more testing.
For reference I was using 'Federal American Eagle Open Tip Match' 140gr ammo, shooting from a bench with sandbags at a measured 100 and 200 yard distance. I have a Leupold Rifleman 3-9X scope, and Leupold dovetail bases and rings. The scope was kept at 9X for all my shots.

I have pictures and even a short video showing all these issues if anyone is interested.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
16,549 Posts
Hairy Toes, welcome to the site from Tennessee. I don't own a Kimber rifle and if I did it would not be the Hunter series. I would want a model with a classic wood stock. I know this was a gift to you so that is kind of tricky, shame your family did not know what you wanted.
I think the Hunter model line of Kimber rifles were made to be "affordable" for the average hunter/shooter and may not have the quality of there more expensive rifles. IMO.
That's a lot of issues for any rifle, I suggest getting Kimber involved asap.
 

· Administrator
Joined
·
42,293 Posts
Welcome to the forum from northern Illinois hairy_toes. Other then to tell you the 84M doesn't take a clip it has a magazine* I have nothing to offer other then to call Kimber.

Customer Service
Toll-Free: (888) 243-4522
Hours: M-F, 9:30 a.m.-7 p.m. Eastern

*The difference between clips and magazines is the presence of a feed mechanism in a magazine, typically a spring-loaded follower, which a clip lacks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2sharp2

· Banned
Joined
·
2,781 Posts
Hello,
I just got a brand new Kimber 84M Hunter model chambered in 6.5 Creedmoor for Christmas. I finally got a chance to test fire it last week. This is my first Kimber rifle. It will probably be my last Kimber product ever. In fact, after trying this stuff I will most likely ditch this rifle and buy something else.
Remington for the budget minded. Winchester for those that can afford a little more or if you find a good deal. Weatherby for those that want the best. IMO, YMMV...
 

· Registered
Joined
·
3 Posts
Discussion Starter · #13 ·
Kimber 84M Hunter 6.5 Creedmoor Info

After reading the responses to this thread, thought I might add a few words.

1) I made a call to Kimber Customer Service yesterday and was told that they no longer include a test target with their rifles.

2) As to what cartridge or bullet they use to perform their three shot accuracy test, I was told that they just use whatever commercial ammunition they happen to have on hand. No specific bullet, weight of bullet, etc. I would assume for the 6.5 Creedmoor, this would be one of the Hornady offerings. I'm a bit skeptical of this, but since this is my first Kimber, perhaps there is something magical about their products and that they are immune to rifle barrel harmonics, the laws of physics, etc.

3) As per hairy toes' responses:

1. I also have difficulty inserting the third cartridge in the clip. However, this is not an issue for me as I seldom load over three total rounds in a hunting rifle.

2. My wing safety is also "stiff", but hopefully will loosen up with use. I did spray the bolt with a significant amount of WD40 and it seemed to help.

3. I see similar grouping as he does. Five shot groups of Hornady factory 140 AMAX's string horizontally. Five shot groups of Nosler 120 Ballistics Tips, cluster three within an inch and throw the last two an inch away at 2:00. Five shot Hornady 129 SST's shoot within 1.25 inch and almost at the same point of impact as the 140 AMAX's. I have a dozen .264" bullets to try. However, if it won't shoot a Lapua 123 grain Scenar or a Berger 130 grain VLD, something is wrong. I wait 4 minutes between shots and always shoot one fouler before starting accuracy testing. I'll do ladder testing with the Hornady 129 grain SST's and see if things improve.

4. I have shot a lot of 6.5 Creedmoor rifles over the last six years and the Kimber may be a bit more finicky than most. I'm confident that this rifle will also shoot five within an inch once I find the proper bullet.

5. On the positive side, the gun is very light and four days of hunting in light rain didn't bother it a bit.

6. The barrel fouls very little. I use "Wipe Out", followed by WD40, then Kroil, and then a light gun oil when cleaning.

7. I can feel one rough spot in the barrel about 10 inches from the muzzle.

Sadly, Kimber Customer Service has not been of much help. One would think if they are going to guarantee three shot MOA accuracy they would at least know what cartridge they tested with. And by the way, it took six phone calls to finally get through to them.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
12 Posts
Something I picked up from another forum. Most scope bases have 4 screws the same lenght. If you look down into the threaded holes in the action the front hole is atleast 1 or 2 threads shallower, due to the threads for the barrel being in this hole. Reports of 3 shot groups being 2 almost toutching and the 3rd a flyer were experienced by others and myself. Shortening the front screw resulted in .5 moa groups. I have modified mine but not tested yet. When I get to the range I will post results.
 

· Banned
Joined
·
2,781 Posts
Something I picked up from another forum. Most scope bases have 4 screws the same lenght. If you look down into the threaded holes in the action the front hole is atleast 1 or 2 threads shallower, due to the threads for the barrel being in this hole. Reports of 3 shot groups being 2 almost toutching and the 3rd a flyer were experienced by others and myself. Shortening the front screw resulted in .5 moa groups. I have modified mine but not tested yet. When I get to the range I will post results.
What is the theory that accounts for "shorter front screw = more accuracy"? A link?
 

· Registered
Joined
·
12 Posts
Got to range today. 3 shot group with Hornady Precision Hunter 143 XLR-X
dropped to >.8 MOA with 2 more groups just under 1 MOA. Hornady Hog Hunter 120 Grain came in at about 1.2 - 1.3 MOA. If you are getting less than expected accurany, I would suggest looking at the front scope mount screw.
 
1 - 18 of 18 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top