Joined
·
836 Posts
I stopped by a local dealer today, just to see what he had. Having never been there before, the guy behind the counter was as new to me as I to him. I started out by asking if he had any used Browning HP's. Of course not. But he didn't criticize the gun by blurting out that it's a single action and nobody likes them. Yes, I have had that happen.
Then I asked if he carried the Kimber line. I immediately received a long dialogue about how the Kimber of today is not the Kimber of yesterday and that moving to the East coast really destroyed the company's quality, (must be the air). I was told how the Sig would out shoot the Kimber everyday and was ten times as reliable, etc.
I asked to see one of these miraculous firearms and he handed me an all steel 5 inch gun. I handled it and that asked if it wasn't a bit heavy for daily carry. I followed with a query regarding something comparable to my Ultra Carry II. He got into his safe and pulled out a Sig Ultra two tone. It's a good looking gun with similar features to my Ultra. I prefer the Ultra II barrel arrangement as the Sig uses a cut away in the upper barrel to facilitate the auto-loading process. I also did not like the lack of an ejection port relieve. I have had experience with .45's that lack that feature.
Other than a couple cosmetic issues, the guns are very similar. Weights, lengths carry capacity are all similar. However, the shop guy seemed to think the Kimber couldn't handle 7 rounds. I actually believe he thinks the Sig carries 7 in the mag. Feature for feature, the sig is very like the Ultra Carry II TLE. And very similar in suggested retail. In the end, I acknowledged the Sig is a good looking gun and that I like the two tone 3 inch 7 round design. But his quoted price was more than $150 dollars more than my regular dealers posted price for the LTE. My regular dealer carries the CDP II, very close in appearance to the sig, for about $75 more than he quoted the Sig. For that money, I'll take the better barrel lug design and the ejection port relief.
Then I asked if he carried the Kimber line. I immediately received a long dialogue about how the Kimber of today is not the Kimber of yesterday and that moving to the East coast really destroyed the company's quality, (must be the air). I was told how the Sig would out shoot the Kimber everyday and was ten times as reliable, etc.
I asked to see one of these miraculous firearms and he handed me an all steel 5 inch gun. I handled it and that asked if it wasn't a bit heavy for daily carry. I followed with a query regarding something comparable to my Ultra Carry II. He got into his safe and pulled out a Sig Ultra two tone. It's a good looking gun with similar features to my Ultra. I prefer the Ultra II barrel arrangement as the Sig uses a cut away in the upper barrel to facilitate the auto-loading process. I also did not like the lack of an ejection port relieve. I have had experience with .45's that lack that feature.
Other than a couple cosmetic issues, the guns are very similar. Weights, lengths carry capacity are all similar. However, the shop guy seemed to think the Kimber couldn't handle 7 rounds. I actually believe he thinks the Sig carries 7 in the mag. Feature for feature, the sig is very like the Ultra Carry II TLE. And very similar in suggested retail. In the end, I acknowledged the Sig is a good looking gun and that I like the two tone 3 inch 7 round design. But his quoted price was more than $150 dollars more than my regular dealers posted price for the LTE. My regular dealer carries the CDP II, very close in appearance to the sig, for about $75 more than he quoted the Sig. For that money, I'll take the better barrel lug design and the ejection port relief.